The Both/And Business

A client sat across from me not long ago, working through a decision that should have been simple. The numbers and the timing made sense, and still, she hesitated.

"I know what the smart move is," she said. "I just don't know if I still want to run this business if that's what it takes."

I hear some version of that sentence more often than I ever thought I would. From the owner of a small shop deciding whether to expand, or a consultant deciding whether to raise her rates. Sometimes it’s a founder deciding whether to bring on staff, or stay small, or sell, or keep going exactly as they are. Different businesses. Different decisions. Same quiet fear underneath: that building something strong means giving up the parts of it they actually love.

I don't think that's true. I think it's one of the most persistent false choices in business and leadership, and I think believing it costs people more than the decisions themselves ever do.

The Choice That Isn't Really a Choice

Somewhere along the way, most of us absorbed the idea that seriousness and joy live on opposite ends of a scale. That the more strategic you become, the less room there is for meaning. That real growth requires a kind of quiet sacrifice, and if you're still enjoying the work, you're probably not pushing hard enough.

It isn't true for the brick-and-mortar owner, the service provider, the product business, the virtual company, or the advisor working alone from a laptop. The shape of the business may change, but the tension doesn't. Personally, I believe that the businesses and lives that actually last aren't the ones that pick a side. They're the ones that learn to hold both. Not as a compromise, but as a skill.

A few places this shows up most often:

Growth, or enjoyment. You can choose growth that's aligned with what you actually want your days to look like, rather than growth for its own sake. The question isn't whether to grow. It's what you're willing to grow into.

Strategy, or meaning. The clearest strategic decisions I've helped people make were rarely the ones stripped of feeling. They were the ones where meaning was treated as data, not a distraction from it.

Adapting, or staying true to why you started. Markets shift. Tools change. What people expect from a brand online today looks nothing like what it did five years ago. You can learn the new thing without abandoning the reason you built the business in the first place. Adaptation and integrity aren't in competition; they're supposed to move together.

Earning well, or helping people. A business that doesn't sustain you eventually can't sustain anyone else either. Earning well isn't the opposite of generosity. Often, it's the thing that makes generosity possible for longer.

Leading decisively, or leading kindly. The best leaders I know aren't soft because they're kind, and they aren't hard because they're decisive. Those are two different axes entirely. You can hold a clear line and hold someone's dignity at the same time.

About The Word "Comfortable"

Comfortable doesn't mean the same number for everyone, and I'm wary of anyone who talks about building a meaningful business without acknowledging that. What feels sustainable to one person would feel like scarcity to another, and what feels like plenty to one would feel like barely enough to someone else. That's not a flaw in the idea. It's just the truth of it.

The point was never the number. The point is whether the decisions that get you there are ones you can actually live inside, day to day, without quietly resenting the business you built to make your life better.

Both, Not Either

None of this means every decision is easy, or that holding both sides of the tension is effortless. It usually isn't. It takes more thought, not less, to find the version of a decision that's both smart and sustaining. That's the work. Not choosing a side and defending it, but sitting with the tension long enough to find the answer that doesn't require you to abandon half of what you care about.

That's how I try to lead, too, not by treating strategy and meaning as competing priorities to be balanced against each other, but as two questions that deserve the same seat at the table. It's slower sometimes. It's also the only version of building I'm interested in anymore.

The choice was never really either/or. It just takes patience to find the both/and.

Mea Brown,
Author, advisor, speaker. I write about building businesses and lives that hold both.

If this resonated, [the Journal has more where this came from →] Join my mailing list and stay informed about future articles. »»»